2026-W36

Published 2026-09-05

← All reports
12632
scanned
12
critical
944
need review
11457
low risk

This week

Critical-risk plugins

12 plugins rated critical — vet-critical or blocking patterns (secrets / exfiltration / destructive / mining)

PluginRisk
dsh-plugin-security-review ★ 2Critical
dsh-qrcode-hassle-free ★ 2Critical
dsh-lmstudio-router ★ 0Critical
dsh-smooth-stream ★ 84Critical
dsh-opencode-zen-free-provider ★ 29Critical
dsh-file-viewer ★ 5Critical
DSH_VsCodeMode ★ 19Critical
dsh-report-studio ★ 2Critical
dsh-themes ★ 1Critical
dsh-vscode-workbench ★ 12Critical
plugin-manager ★ 1Critical
meww ★ 1Critical

Needs review (medium)

944 plugins rated medium — vet suspicious, or retired "high" hits like code execution / shell

PluginRisk
dsh-doctor ★ 6Medium
DeepSeek-Harness-Desktop ★ 6Medium
dsh-deepseek-web-adapter ★ 18Medium
dsh-flowglass ★ 24Medium
dsh-wallpaper-bridge ★ 2Medium
dsh-plugin-gate ★ 0Medium
dsh-raw-html ★ 85Medium
dsh-automation ★ 0Medium
dsh-remote-access ★ 0Medium
dsh-witness ★ 0Medium
dsh-purge ★ 10,472Medium
dsh-pet-remielle ★ 54Medium
dsh-desktop-electron ★ 3Medium
dsh-vision ★ 7Medium
crossplug ★ 1Medium
dsh-web-launcher ★ 1Medium
chromex-browser ★ 1Medium
dsh-shield ★ 1Medium
dsh-sim-restart ★ 0Medium
dsh-server-deployment ★ 35Medium

Showing the 20 most severe.

Automated heuristic scan (static analysis) — a scalable first line of defense; may produce false positives. Not a manual review.

Weekly report archive

11 reports

What does this weekly report measure?

This report measures the automated static scan state of the dsh.so plugin registry during 2026-W36: the number of scanned plugins, the distribution across three tiers (low, medium, critical), and the plugins whose risk tier changed since the previous archive.

Why isn't this report an endorsement?

A report row reflects public repository metadata and heuristic rule matches, not a manual audit or runtime verification. False positives and false negatives are possible, so risk flags are a reason to inspect a plugin before install rather than a substitute for that inspection.

The static scan is only one layer. A second, model-driven dynamic security audit reads the source context of entries the static scan already flags as needing review: it covers that subset only, can raise a verdict but never exempt one, and the verdict shown across the site is the stricter of the two (max of static and dynamic). As of the latest run: 1898 dynamic audit records, 1767 with a model conclusion, 258 raised above the static verdict, 0 lowered below it.

Source: dsh.so security standards · Maintained by dsh.so · Published

Was this page helpful?