@MCshamrock/dsh-cookie-431 avatar

@MCshamrock/dsh-cookie-431

修复 DeepSeek Harness 桌面版启动报 Web authentication failed(cookie 堆积导致 HTTP 431)

Ecosystem appDesktopNetworkWeb search
Verification
L5 · Ecosystem app
Risk
Pending
Health
Active
Trust
Bronze

Install verification: Ecosystem app: not installed via dsh plugin add, so the L1-L5 plugin install-verification ladder does not apply; the security scan still runs.

Data as of (UTC)

L1–L5 verification rules

What it does

修复 DeepSeek Harness 桌面版启动报 Web authentication failed(cookie 堆积导致 HTTP 431)

Installation

GitHub repository

Ecosystem apps are not installable via dsh plugin add: desktop / web shells install or deploy through their own release channel (GitHub Releases or the project site).

The level reads L5 · Ecosystem plugin / L5 · Ecosystem app per the three-way classification (the L1-L5 ladder does not rate them); the security scan still runs.

Verification & Compatibility

No verification record yet for this plugin.

  • • Node.js: not stated
  • • DSH: not stated
  • • External credentials: none detected

Author badges

Embed the dsh.so badges in your README to show this plugin's automated security-scan and install-test status:

dsh.so risk badge
`[![dsh.so risk](https://cdn.dsh.so/badge/dsh-cookie-431.svg)](https://www.dsh.so/artifact/dsh-cookie-431/?ref=badge)`

dsh.so is an independent community project, not affiliated with or endorsed by DeepSeek AI. Badges are maintained by dsh.so; embed links carry a ?ref= attribution parameter.

Security Report

Two automated layers, neither a manual review: a static scan (per-plugin rule checks) and a model-driven dynamic security audit that covers only the subset static-flagged at warn or above and never executes plugin code.

dsh-cookie-431Automated review · daily

Static low; dynamic no conclusion (static stands) → overall low.

static low→dynamic no conclusion→overall low
static findings0 critical·0 high·0 files scanned
lowoverall · low
1static scandeterministic rules · no code execution · shape only
plugin version—
scanned versiona3e04105a3752026-10-29
current versiona3e04105a375same version

The scan result is valid for the scanned commit. New commits within 7 days are tolerated (the rating still counts); after 7 days without a rescan the badge shows outdated.

2model reads redacted source context · never executes plugin code

not in the dynamic queue (the queue only covers plugins whose static tier is medium or above — medium/high/critical; since 2026-10-24 entries rated low are not audited even when dsh-only rules logged warnings) — this does not mean the dynamic audit found it safe.

Rule (2026-10-28): when a dynamic conclusion exists it is authoritative (it may raise or lower the level); the static scan tier (vet primary, dsh backstop) applies only when there is none (not queued / audit failed / withdrawn). The audit never writes the exemption list (exemptions are manual only); a wrong conclusion is withdrawn by human review and the tier falls back to the static scan tier.

Disclaimer: the static scan and the dynamic security audit are both automated analysis, not a security guarantee. Always review what you install.

Activity

Last commit 2026-10-29 · activity: Active

• Repo created: 2026-10-29

• Stars: ★ 1 · Forks: 0

• Health: Active — committed within last 30 days

Source

GitHub: github.com/MCshamrock/dsh-cookie-431

Frequently asked questions

What is @MCshamrock/dsh-cookie-431?

@MCshamrock/dsh-cookie-431 is an ecosystem app listed on dsh.so, not a DSH plugin package: it cannot be installed with dsh plugin add and ships through the project's own release channel.

Is dsh.so or this plugin page official?

dsh.so is an independent community registry and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DeepSeek AI.

How do I install @MCshamrock/dsh-cookie-431?

This is an ecosystem app, not a plugin installable via dsh plugin add: desktop / web shells install or deploy through their own release channel. The security scan still runs, but the L1-L5 plugin install ladder does not rate it.

How does the security scan relate to a manual audit?

Both layers are automated, not a manual audit. The static scan is heuristic analysis of the repository source, so it can produce false positives and miss context. The model-driven dynamic security audit only covers plugins static-flagged at warn or above, never executes plugin code, and its conclusion is authoritative when there is one (it may raise or lower the static tier); exemptions stay manual. Neither layer is an endorsement: review the repository and the permissions it asks for before installing, together with the verification level and health signals.

How fresh is the data on this page?

The data on this page is as of 2026-10-29 (UTC) — the most recent valid timestamp among the registry refresh, install verification, security scan and dynamic audit. Build time is never used as a data date.

Was this page helpful?