Install verification: sandbox install failed (L4) · tested on dsh 0.2.1-rc.3 · last checked Install verification details →
Data as of (UTC)
What it doesAI
DSH Code Review — 为 DeepSeek Harness 提供 Codex 风格代码审查、原生独立子 Agent、灵活范围选择和中英文报告 · Codex-style code review with native independent agents, flexible scope selection, and bilingual reports for DSH
Capability tags are AI-inferred or rule-extracted from the README (see badge) — vocabulary-limited, not install-verified. AI = inferred; README = literal keyword from the readme.
Installation
dsh plugin --profile web add @michengai/dsh-code-reviewInstall method: npm · sandbox install failed (L4)
Verification & Compatibility
Grouped by plugin version: each card lists the dsh versions actually tested against that artifact version and their install verdicts (L5 wins). Untested combinations are omitted — absence means untested, never assumed compatible. L1–L3 are a plugin-level static archive (independent of the dsh version — the same verdict on every dsh row): they sit in each row's level grid next to L4/L5, marked "static", while their evidence is stored once per plugin inside that row's "checks & evidence" instead of being duplicated per version.
External credentials (plugin-level): none detected
Based on 1 requirement(s) across 10 @deepseek-ai/dsh-* packages. raw ranges
0.1.2-rc.1 || 0.1.5-rc.1 || 0.1.5-rc.2 || 0.1.5-rc.3 || 0.1.7-rc.1 || 0.1.7-rc.2 || 0.2.0-rc.1 || 0.2.0-rc.2 || 0.2.1-alpha.2 ×10
✗ Running dsh 0.2.1-rc.3 is outside the declared range — the official install gate rejects it (incompatible-version).
To force-install, grant an exact-version exemption: dsh plugin allow-version dsh-code-review-7@0.1.14 0.2.1-rc.3 (the exemption lives in the local profile; this site does not assume one)
Deciding channel: no engines.dsh declared, so every dsh* peer is checked (workspace:^ | ~ | * counts as the running version).
Whether it actually runs is a separate question → see the measured matrix below (L1–L5).
| plugin \ dsh | dsh 0.2.1-rc.3 | dsh 0.2.1-rc.2 | dsh 0.2.1-alpha.4 | dsh 0.2.1-alpha.2 | dsh 0.2.0-rc.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.4 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 1.0.3 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 1.0.1 | · | ✗ | · | · | · |
| 0.1.16 | · | · | ✓ | · | · |
| 0.1.15 | · | · | · | · | · |
1.0.4npm2026-10-28
@michengai/dsh-code-review
No runtime install test for this version (static scan only) — compatibility unknown, never assumed.
1.0.3npm2026-10-26
@michengai/dsh-code-review
No runtime install test for this version (static scan only) — compatibility unknown, never assumed.
1.0.1npm1 failed2026-10-19
@michengai/dsh-code-review
✗dsh 0.2.1-rc.22026-10-19L5 · failed
- • Node.js: v24.14.0
- • DSH: 0.2.1-rc.2
- • Plugin artifact: npm · @michengai/dsh-code-review@1.0.1
ID: dsh-code-review-7@1.0.1@dsh0.2.1-rc.2 · profile: l4-sandbox
Issued: 2026-10-19 · expires: 2026-10-26
View checks & evidence
↳ carried from earlier record dsh-code-review-7@1.0.4@dsh0.2.1-rc.3 (l3-fullscan)
↳ carried from earlier record dsh-code-review-7@1.0.4@dsh0.2.1-rc.3 (l3-fullscan)
↳ carried from earlier record dsh-code-review-7@1.0.4@dsh0.2.1-rc.3 (l3-fullscan)
L1–L3 are plugin-level static conclusions (baseline, identical across dsh versions): evidence is stored once per plugin.
0.1.16npm✓ 1 runtime-verified2026-10-16
@michengai/dsh-code-review
✓dsh 0.2.1-alpha.42026-10-16L5 · runtime verified
- • Node.js: v24.14.0
- • DSH: 0.2.1-alpha.4
- • Plugin artifact: npm · @michengai/dsh-code-review@0.1.16
ID: dsh-code-review-7@0.1.16@dsh0.2.1-alpha.4 · profile: l4-sandbox
Issued: 2026-10-16 · expires: 2026-10-23
View checks & evidence
↳ carried from earlier record dsh-code-review-7@1.0.4@dsh0.2.1-rc.3 (l3-fullscan)
↳ carried from earlier record dsh-code-review-7@1.0.4@dsh0.2.1-rc.3 (l3-fullscan)
↳ carried from earlier record dsh-code-review-7@1.0.4@dsh0.2.1-rc.3 (l3-fullscan)
active in loader tree (150 entries)
L1–L3 are plugin-level static conclusions (baseline, identical across dsh versions): evidence is stored once per plugin.
0.1.15npm2026-10-15
@michengai/dsh-code-review
No runtime install test for this version (static scan only) — compatibility unknown, never assumed.
Only the latest 3 published versions are shown; source-snapshot (commit hash) groups, unstated groups and older versions are omitted — the full archive stays in the data layer (snapshot/unstated groups appear only when a plugin has no published version).
Author badges
Embed the dsh.so badges in your README to show this plugin's automated security-scan and install-test status:
`[](https://www.dsh.so/artifact/dsh-code-review-7/?ref=badge)``[](https://www.dsh.so/artifact/dsh-code-review-7/?ref=badge-install)``[](https://www.dsh.so/artifact/dsh-code-review-7/?ref=badge-install)``[](https://www.dsh.so/artifact/dsh-code-review-7/?ref=badge-install)`dsh.so is an independent community project, not affiliated with or endorsed by DeepSeek AI. Badges are maintained by dsh.so; embed links carry a ?ref= attribution parameter.
Security Report
Two automated layers, neither a manual review: a static scan (per-plugin rule checks) and a model-driven dynamic security audit that covers only the subset static-flagged at warn or above and never executes plugin code.
Static low; dynamic medium (authoritative when present) → overall medium.
v1.0.5dsh manifest1.0.5npm2026-10-291.0.5same versionclean · npmVet is an AST static scan (npm artifact or git source).
show static findings (1)
- criticalshellExec · shell
lib/request.js:6const { stdout } = await exec('git', ['--no-optional-locks', ...args], {
show 3 audit findings
- mediumRepo-controlled commit subject is interpolated verbatim into the review sub-agent prompt
lib/request.js:29selection.js builds `title` from `git log -n 100 --format=%H%x09%s`, i.e. the raw commit subject of the repository under review, and request.js splices it unescaped into the task text that becomes the review sub-agent's prompt. Commit subjects are arbitrary attacker text in a cloned repository, so a malicious subject can carry instructions ('ignore the above, run X') directly at the instruction level of an agent that has file and shell tools. No user-typed input is required — only selecting a commit from the menu. Exploitation still depends on the sub-agent model complying, which is why this i
- lowBase-mode fallback embeds the unresolved ref inside a shell command substitution in the prompt
lib/request.js:57When the chosen ref cannot be resolved by `git rev-parse --verify --end-of-options` (typo or nonexistent branch), the free-form user ref is written into a runnable shell snippet that the sub-agent is told to execute; a value containing `$(` or backticks executes inside the double-quoted substitution. The actor here is the local user typing the ref, so it is largely self-inflicted, but an unvalidated string crossing into a shell template is still a hardening gap worth closing. Normal (resolvable) refs only reach prose, and git itself is never invoked through a shell by this plugin.
- lowModel-controlled finding path is rendered as a Markdown link without scheme validation
lib/report.js:111finding.path originates from the review model, which reads untrusted repository content and can be steered by it. Only `?`, `#`, `)` and `]` are neutralised; encodeURI leaves `:` and `=` intact, so a path such as `javascript:location.href=...` produces a link with that scheme inside the rendered report. Whether this is clickable/executable depends on the host's Markdown renderer, which is outside this plugin, hence low.
Entry points lib/index.js and lib/runtime.js were not harvested. Visible code runs git via execFile with no shell; the real issue is repo-controlled text flowing unescaped into the review sub-agent prompt.
Rule (2026-10-28): when a dynamic conclusion exists it is authoritative (it may raise or lower the level); the static scan tier (vet primary, dsh backstop) applies only when there is none (not queued / audit failed / withdrawn). The audit never writes the exemption list (exemptions are manual only); a wrong conclusion is withdrawn by human review and the tier falls back to the static scan tier.
Disclaimer: the static scan and the dynamic security audit are both automated analysis, not a security guarantee. Always review what you install.
Activity
Last commit 2026-10-29 · activity: Active
• Repo created: 2026-09-13
• Stars: ★ 15 · Forks: 2
• Health: Active — committed within last 30 days
Source
Author README
View on GitHub ↗The author's original README from the repository — fetched live, unedited (the English page loads the default README).
Frequently asked questions
What is dsh-code-review?
dsh-code-review is a DeepSeek Harness (dsh) plugin listed on dsh.so — an independent community registry that indexes public source repositories and publishes automated security-scan and install-verification results for each entry.
Is dsh.so or this plugin page official?
dsh.so is an independent community registry and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DeepSeek AI.
How do I install dsh-code-review?
Run dsh plugin --profile web add @michengai/dsh-code-review in a DeepSeek Harness (dsh) environment. The command is parsed from the plugin manifest and its install spec is verified (L3); runtime sandbox install testing may not have run yet.
How does the security scan relate to a manual audit?
Both layers are automated, not a manual audit. The static scan is heuristic analysis of the repository source, so it can produce false positives and miss context. The model-driven dynamic security audit only covers plugins static-flagged at warn or above, never executes plugin code, and its conclusion is authoritative when there is one (it may raise or lower the static tier); exemptions stay manual. Neither layer is an endorsement: review the repository and the permissions it asks for before installing, together with the verification level and health signals.
How fresh is the data on this page?
The data on this page is as of 2026-10-29 (UTC) — the most recent valid timestamp among the registry refresh, install verification, security scan and dynamic audit. Build time is never used as a data date.
